Understanding Property Tax in Kansas

A nonpartisan educational resource — and the Coalition's own position on where this should lead

Our position is that property taxes should be eliminated in Kansas entirely — not reduced, capped, or restructured. This guide doesn't ask you to adopt that position before reading it. It explains how the system works, what other states have tried (including approaches that stop short of full elimination), what complete elimination would require, and what it would mean for schools, local governments, and different groups of Kansans — using government records and cited sources throughout, so you can reach your own conclusion. Read more on About This Educational Guide.

Kansas property taxes affect homeowners, renters, businesses, schools, local governments, and communities across the state. Understanding the system requires more than looking at the number on a tax bill — it means understanding how property is valued, how mill levies are set, which governments receive the revenue, and what changing the system would actually involve.

Understanding the System & the Reform Debate

How Property Tax Works

What makes property tax different from other taxes, where the money Kansas collects actually goes, and the arguments made for and against it.

Statewide History & County Data

The 1998-2025 statewide trend, all 105 counties ranked and searchable, the appeal/payment timeline, and how delinquency can lead to tax foreclosure.

The History of Property Tax in Kansas

Property tax has been part of Kansas since before statehood — and the Constitution's own rules for it have changed six times since 1859.

Is Kansas Property Tax Constitutional?

A legal question with more nuance than it first appears — what the Kansas and U.S. Constitutions actually say, including a landmark 2023 Supreme Court ruling.

The Path to Repeal

Kansas's constitution requires property tax today. Here's the specific legal process to change that — and what's been tried recently.

How Other States Have Tried This

North Dakota, Texas, Wyoming, Pennsylvania, Florida, and California have each approached property tax differently. What was proposed, what happened, and what Kansas can learn.

The Replacement Revenue Math

What would it actually take to replace property tax with a sales tax? The real numbers, worked through and clearly labeled.

Other Ways to Fund Repeal

A dedicated trust fund, land value taxation, phased homestead exemptions — three more real, implemented models, none of them full elimination.

Other Proposed Frameworks

A far more sweeping proposal from an outside group, gathered here for awareness — not implemented anywhere, and not a Coalition position.

Amendment Language & Legislative Mechanics

What a repeal resolution actually looks like, structurally, and how it moves through the Legislature.

What Full Elimination Would Require

Other states have taken different approaches short of full elimination — capping increases, raising exemptions, restructuring how property is assessed. Those are covered throughout this guide for comparison, since they're useful for understanding what's been tried and why it fell short of full elimination — they aren't the Coalition's position, and including them isn't an endorsement of stopping there.

Based on the constitutional mechanics of amending Kansas's tax requirement and the track record of similar efforts in other states, eliminating property tax in Kansas raises several legal, fiscal, and governmental questions:

  1. How much revenue is involved, and where would it come from instead? Kansas property tax totals roughly $6.2 billion a year — a specific, named replacement source (a dedicated fund, a targeted tax swap, phased exemption growth, or spending reallocation) would need to be identified clearly enough to show legislators and voters up front, not promised for later. Kansas's own 2026 proposal to swap the 20-mill school levy for a 0.75-cent sales tax increase shows what a first, targeted step could look like in concrete Kansas terms.
  2. How does a plan account for the fact that roughly 99% of this money is spent locally, not by the state? A plan has to address school boards, counties, and cities separately, not just the state's own 20-mill school levy.
  3. What legislative threshold would a specific proposal need to clear? Since Kansas has no citizen initiative process, a constitutional amendment can only reach voters after 84 House votes and 27 Senate votes in the same session.
  4. What happens to schools, counties, and cities during the transition? Wyoming's 2024 amendment, which gave the legislature new flexibility before attempting full repeal, illustrates one possible sequencing — structural change first, rate change later.
  5. What would voters ultimately decide, and on what timeline? Once a resolution clears the legislature, a statewide vote (or special election) decides it by simple majority.

Read The Path to Repeal for the specific numbers behind question 3, How Other States Have Tried This for the record on questions 1 and 4 elsewhere, The Replacement Revenue Math and Other Ways to Fund Repeal for what a replacement source for Kansas would actually need to look like, and Amendment Language & Legislative Mechanics for what question 3 looks like on paper.

This guide reflects publicly available legislative and government records as of September 2026. Kansas legislative sessions run annually, and bill status, vote counts, and program details should be verified against current session records before republishing or citing specific figures. See Sources for citations and About This Educational Guide for our editorial approach.